Matt Taibbi: The fact that the government failed to prevent a terrorist attack through incompetence and, on some level, corruption, is simply not high on my list of outrages, at least not compared to other things that have gone on.
It is a very different thing than causing the attacks to happen, or being part of their planning, which is what the 9/11 Truth movement continually asserts. Moreover, it continually does so in a supremely intellectually dishonest way, charging complicity and then retreating into these nebulous calls for answers to questions about the official story, when asked to produce evidence of said complicity.
But I take it you are conceding that there is no evidence of US complicity in these attacks. Can you answer that question directly?
Jon Gold: 9/11 was a crime, and elements within our Government and others have MORE THAN EARNED the title of suspect for that crime. That?s how I answer your question of complicity.
But hey Matt? thanks for admitting that ?of course we?ve been lied to about 9/11.? I?ll remember that the next time you take a shot at the only movement that has been supportive of the families seeking justice, and the 9/11 First Responders seeking health care.
Matt Taibbi: Again, I would be completely on board with calls for more investigation into the official story, if the movement would only stop with these childish insinuations that Bush and Cheney were somehow behind 9/11. It?s asinine and an incredible distraction.
Moreover the government?s failure in 9/11 was, comparatively speaking, a rather small-scale screwup, compared to its intentional invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and its failure to police Wall Street. I?m with Noam Chomsky on this one. If you?re looking down the list of US Government outrages, 9/11 doesn?t crack the top 100.
Jon Gold: Childish insinuations? I don?t think it?s childish at all to point to suspects of a crime. Especially when there is MORE THAN ENOUGH reason to think so. What I think is childish is a no talent journalist who has no idea what he?s talking about attacking a movement that represents a cause he knows nothing about. I think it?s cowardly, immature, and irresponsible. For a ?journalist.? Please.
As you can see, Jon is one of those people who believe in the awesome power of ALL CAPS to prove his point. That's because he doesn't have strong arguments. I gotta love the part where he challenges Taibbi to "read" his 9-11 Troof starter kit:
Here is the 9/11 Report. I suggest you read it, and ask others to read it to understand the ?official account.?
After that, I suggest you ask people to watch ?9/11: Press For Truth??
Then I suggest you ask people to watch the companion DVD ?In Their Own Words: The Untold Stories Of The 9/11 Families??
Then I suggest ask people to you watch then former Rep. Cynthia McKinney chair the 9/11 Omission Hearings that took place not two months after the release of the 9/11 Report in New York City on 9/9/2004?
Then I suggest you ask people to watch then Rep. Cynthia McKinney?s 9/11 Congressional Briefing held in Washington D.C. on 7/22/2005?
Yep, of the first five things Gold wants Taibbi to "read", only the 9-11 Commission Report is actually written down; the rest are movies.
Source: http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2011/03/gold-admits-hes-crackpot.html
oceans movie movie clips new movie trailers 2010 up the movie movie 6
No comments:
Post a Comment